This is a fantastic display with only very minor problems.

When I set out to purchase a new television, I had no idea just how much work it would entail. I knew for sure that I wanted to replace my 32-inch Sony Trinitron with a flat-panel which supports 1920x1080p. I knew that I wanted to plug in my Mac Mini to use it as a monitor in my living room, and I knew that it needed to have multiple inputs. Beyond that, the possibilities would be defined by my investigations and expectations. One screen came out on top - the Sharp Aquos LC-52d62u.

At just over $3000, it was an expensive purchase. I was OK with spending the extra cash because my needs are many, and the versatility and quality would be utilized by my many devices I would attach to it.

This screen has several inputs. Two HDMI (High Definition Multimedia Interface) ports, Two component inputs, one S-video, and one co-axial input. The only inputs you will be able to use to view high-definition video (1920x1080 or 1280x720) are the 2 HDMI ports and the 2 component ports. For most people, that should be enough. the other inputs are limited to standard definition video ( the kind of video you get from a VCR, standard DVD player, cable box, satellite system, or other standard video source). I have not yet looked for a good HD source for broadcast/satellite/cable channels. My HD sources are limited to my Xbox 360 (with HD DVD player), and my Mac Mini.

There is one optical SPDIF audio input port on the back, with a pass-through for stereo output using 2 RCA-style plugs. This optical input is for using the internal stereo speakers on the TV. they work fine, but I recommend pairing this TV with a stereo receiver that has optical capabilities and video switching capabilities (the prices on these are coming WAY down - it's worth the extra cash if you do not already have one). I have a simple Onkyo receiver which handles my audio feeds and my video switching for my standard definition video sources. To switch my HD sources, I must use the inputs on the TV or replace my receiver with one that supports HD input. I have not yet looked into this either.

The screen is very clear. When using the Mac Mini, every pixel is easily distinguishable at 1920x1080 resolution. Web sites look crystal clear, and Apple's Front Row software shows me video with style and clarity. I downloaded a few HD movie trailers to test the system, and the quality is simply incredible. I think I may easily enjoy some films on this screen more than I did seeing them in the movie theater. Setting up the screen to work with the Mini was a bit of a challenge. It accepted the video signal on the first try, but I had to browse Apple's forums to figure out what the correct settings were to get the video to fill the screen perfectly, without overscan, and at full resolution. That process should have been easier, but probably should be blamed on the Mac's software, not the Sharp screen.

My Xbox 360 must be attached using the component inputs, as HDMI is not yet available for the Xbox 360. the quality is fantastic. There is a very slight but detectable loss in quality when going from HDMI to component, but movies still look great. I purchased "Poseidon" in HD from the Xbox marketplace and it looked GREAT. I'll not purchase another movie or TV show from the Xbox marketplace because of their DRM restrictions, but it was worth the test.

I really cannot wait for some titles to come out on HD DVD. They look great on the Sharp screen. Easily as good as or better than theater quality.

One drawback of HD is that it really shows EVERY flaw in standard definition. This is a flaw with SD, not the Sharp. DVDs look great on the screen, but there is a lot of noise, and the colors are slightly de-saturated (products of standard definition's MPEG-2 compression and lower resolution - 720x480). My SD tivo, satellite TV, and DVDs look just fine, but compared to the HD video, there's just no comparison.

The Mac Mini's iSight camera allows me to video-conference with my Mom in Idaho for free using my DSL internet connection. I can sit on my couch and chat with Mom on my big screen. Almost as good as having her in the same room. My daughter loves it!

With HD's new standards, many local network affiliates are now broadcasting their signal for free through the air in HD (720, not 1080). I purchased an antenna to view these sources, but I was unable to watch anything except for some VERY low quality standard-def signals. It was like I was watching our old 19" sony TV in 1977 all over again. Static, poor quality, and poor reception. I'm sure there's a way to hook these antennas up correctly, but I was unable to figure it out. I'll probably go with a satellite solution for HD broadcast content. I really want to watch Battlestar Galactica in HD!

The Sharp LC-52d62u has nice minimalist lines and does not stand out in my living room. Unlike the Sony and Pioneer products, this unit's dark colors and subtle design keep the focus on the content, not the hardware.

The screen weighs in at just under 100 lbs. That's pretty heavy. Don't think that this screen is portable - I would never think to move it, and I'm reconsidering my idea of a wall-mount. The base that the unit ships with is very attractive and very stable. Not flimsy at all.

The remote that ships with the screen is easy to hold, but not very attractive. It is also a bit large. I use my Logitech Harmony remote which was easily configured to work with this new screen despite the fact that the screen was built long after the remote was purchased. I am able to control everything in the entertainment center with one remote including the video screen.

In closing, I must say that I am very happy with my purchase. Picture quality is stellar, clarity is amazing, and set-up was mostly painless. the remote needs work, and it really should have a DVI port for direct PC connection (I had to use a DVI to HDMI converter to hook up the Mac Mini, but it works great). Once I have an HD-capable receiver to switch video sources for me, I'll be riding high!